When it comes to creating a new website, there are numerous paths you can take. Some tools will enable you to create a website in minutes, without the need for any complex coding. However, it’s important not to forget how important Hyper Text Markup Language (HTML) is – regardless of your chosen software.
HTML is one of the building blocks of just about every website. Therefore, a better understanding of HTML will help you build more effective sites, which can be fully tailored to your individual needs. Strong HTML skills are also essential when you’re looking to improve accessibility, and make your site friendly to all visitors.
In this post, we’ll explain what HTML is, how it affects your website, and why it’s important for anyone interested in web design to understand the language’s basics. Let’s get started!
What HTML Is (And Why It’s Used)
HTML is the standard ‘markup language’ used for creating web pages. It’s assisted in the creation of more than 74% of all known websites, and is incredibly commonplace across the web.
Although they often work together, it’s important not to confuse HTML with Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) or JavaScript. CSS ‘styles’ a page, enabling you to customize more design-based elements – such as font colors and sizes. JavaScript, on the other hand, adds more dynamic functionality to your pages.
As for HTML, it’s used to establish the actual structure and presentation of your site. Each visitor’s browser will ‘read’ your site’s HTML, and use that data to determine how to display pages and content. HTML can also be used to enhance specific elements and create additional features (for example, numbered and bulleted lists).
How HTML Affects Web Design
Before going any further, let’s explore how HTML actually works. Understanding the language’s basics will help you make sense of the role it plays in your site’s design, and why it’s such an important factor.
First, take a look at this blog post:
It’s likely that you’ll be able to name each element this post contains. There’s a heading at the top, a subheading a bit further down, plenty of body/paragraph text, and an image.
Markup languages identify each distinct element on a page, and they use ‘tags’ to do it. Every web page is made up of these HTML tags. There are plenty of options, although some of the most commonly-encountered are:
Header tags
Paragraph tags
Image tags
Each piece of content on a web page should be ‘wrapped’ in the corresponding HTML tags, to indicate what that element is. For example, the heading of your page would be surrounded by header tags, like this:
Using these tags tells browsers that the content inside them is a header. This will ensure that it’s displayed using the correct formatting. You’ll see both opening and closing tags in the example above, which look exactly the same except that the closing tag includes a forward slash.
By applying HTML in this way, you can add headings, format paragraphs, control line breaks, make lists, emphasize text, create links, insert images, build tables, and much more. Then you can use CSS to determine what styles should apply to each kind of element, and your changes will be implemented throughout every relevant part of your site.
Why It’s Important to Understand HTML
With the ready availability of easy-to-use website builders, you’d be forgiven for assuming that understanding HTML is no longer essential. While this is true on some level, taking the time to learn HTML will benefit you in more ways than one.
To begin with, no matter how much effort you put into your content, things can always go wrong. Spacing may shift unexpectedly, or your font sizes can become inconsistent. A basic understanding of HTML will enable you to easily fix these types of issues, without the need for outside help. Working with web developers can be expensive, after all, so learning HTML can save you a lot of time and money.
A clearer understanding of HTML can also help you improve your site’s accessibility. More than a billion people in the world experience a disability of some kind, and many of these people navigate the web using screen readers. When this type of assistive device scans a web page, it collects information about the HTML structure – not the way it appears in a typical browser.
As such, it’s important to make sure your HTML is ‘semantic’, or well-structured. Defining headings, paragraphs, and images using HTML lets screen readers know what kind of content they’re dealing with, and how each element on the page relates. This makes it more likely that all visitors will be able to understand your content.
How to Get Started With HTML
On the surface, HTML may come across as complicated. Of course, the more in-depth you delve into this language, the more complexity will arise. However, basic HTML is fairly easy to learn.
There are several routes you can take when you’re looking to pick up some HTML skills. Naturally, you can opt for one-on-one lessons through an educational facility. However, this is likely to be expensive.
Fortunately, there are plenty of alternatives. You can find lots of informative articles and blog posts that will aid you in your HTML journey. What’s more, there’s also a host of handy tools available online.
For example, W3Schools is a completely free resource that will teach you everything you need to know through short, engaging lessons:
There are mini tasks that enable you to test out your new skills. Plus, when you’re done with HTML, you can use this site to research other key languages.
Codeacademy is another valuable resource:
This particular tutorial has been completed over 3 million times, including by employees from NASA. The HTML course takes just four hours to complete, and contains just about everything you’ll need to craft effective websites. Basic Codeacademy plans are free, although premium plans are also available.
Finally, Alison is a free online learning resource that offers lessons on pretty much everything:
There are countless HTML-specific options, where experienced coders pass on their first-hand knowledge. Each course also comes with a star rating, so you can focus on those with the best reviews.
Conclusion
No matter what platform you use, HTML will likely form the foundation of your website. When applied correctly, it clearly defines the headers, paragraphs, subheadings, images, and other elements used throughout your site.
A better understanding of HTML will equip you with the skills needed to fix any minor content-related issues. Plus, you’ll be able to make custom design tweaks quickly and easily. Fortunately, there are plenty of places where you can pick up the basics of HTML in a no-stress environment.
Do you have any further questions about using HTML? Let us know in the comments section below!
Related Posts
That again was no use: he but got another smile and a friendly look of the sort he no longer wanted. I said I thought I could gallop if Harry could, and in a few minutes we were up with the ambulance. It had stopped. There were several men about it, including Sergeant Jim and Kendall, which two had come from Quinn, and having just been in the ambulance, at Ferry's side, were now remounting, both of them openly in tears. "Hello, Kendall." We have this great advantage in dealing with Plato—that his philosophical writings have come down to us entire, while the thinkers who preceded him are known only through fragments and second-hand reports. Nor is the difference merely accidental. Plato was the creator of speculative literature, properly so called: he was the first and also the greatest artist that ever clothed abstract thought in language of appropriate majesty and splendour; and it is probably to their beauty of form that we owe the preservation of his writings. Rather unfortunately, however, along with the genuine works of the master, a certain number of pieces have been handed down to us under his name, of which some are almost universally admitted to be spurious, while the authenticity of others is a question on which the best scholars are still divided. In the absence of any very cogent external evidence, an immense amount of industry and learning has been expended on this subject, and the arguments employed on both sides sometimes make us doubt whether the reasoning powers of philologists are better developed than, according to Plato, were those of mathematicians in his time. The176 two extreme positions are occupied by Grote, who accepts the whole Alexandrian canon, and Krohn, who admits nothing but the Republic;115 while much more serious critics, such as Schaarschmidt, reject along with a mass of worthless compositions several Dialogues almost equal in interest and importance to those whose authenticity has never been doubted. The great historian of Greece seems to have been rather undiscriminating both in his scepticism and in his belief; and the exclusive importance which he attributed to contemporary testimony, or to what passed for such with him, may have unduly biassed his judgment in both directions. As it happens, the authority of the canon is much weaker than Grote imagined; but even granting his extreme contention, our view of Plato’s philosophy would not be seriously affected by it, for the pieces which are rejected by all other critics have no speculative importance whatever. The case would be far different were we to agree with those who impugn the genuineness of the Parmenides, the Sophist, the Statesman, the Philêbus, and the Laws; for these compositions mark a new departure in Platonism amounting to a complete transformation of its fundamental principles, which indeed is one of the reasons why their authenticity has been denied. Apart, however, from the numerous evidences of Platonic authorship furnished by the Dialogues themselves, as well as by the indirect references to them in Aristotle’s writings, it seems utterly incredible that a thinker scarcely, if at all, inferior to the master himself—as the supposed imitator must assuredly have been—should have consented to let his reasonings pass current under a false name, and that, too, the name of one whose teaching he in some respects controverted; while there is a further difficulty in assuming that his existence could pass unnoticed at a period marked by intense literary and philosophical activity. Readers who177 wish for fuller information on the subject will find in Zeller’s pages a careful and lucid digest of the whole controversy leading to a moderately conservative conclusion. Others will doubtless be content to accept Prof. Jowett’s verdict, that ‘on the whole not a sixteenth part of the writings which pass under the name of Plato, if we exclude the works rejected by the ancients themselves, can be fairly doubted by those who are willing to allow that a considerable change and growth may have taken place in his philosophy.’116 To which we may add that the Platonic dialogues, whether the work of one or more hands, and however widely differing among themselves, together represent a single phase of thought, and are appropriately studied as a connected series. Before entering on our task, one more difficulty remains to be noticed. Plato, although the greatest master of prose composition that ever lived, and for his time a remarkably voluminous author, cherished a strong dislike for books, and even affected to regret that the art of writing had ever been invented. A man, he said, might amuse himself by putting down his ideas on paper, and might even find written178 memoranda useful for private reference, but the only instruction worth speaking of was conveyed by oral communication, which made it possible for objections unforeseen by the teacher to be freely urged and answered.117 Such had been the method of Socrates, and such was doubtless the practice of Plato himself whenever it was possible for him to set forth his philosophy by word of mouth. It has been supposed, for this reason, that the great writer did not take his own books in earnest, and wished them to be regarded as no more than the elegant recreations of a leisure hour, while his deeper and more serious thoughts were reserved for lectures and conversations, of which, beyond a few allusions in Aristotle, every record has perished. That such, however, was not the case, may be easily shown. In the first place it is evident, from the extreme pains taken by Plato to throw his philosophical expositions into conversational form, that he did not despair of providing a literary substitute for spoken dialogue. Secondly, it is a strong confirmation of this theory that Aristotle, a personal friend and pupil of Plato during many years, should so frequently refer to the Dialogues as authoritative evidences of his master’s opinions on the most important topics. And, lastly, if it can be shown that the documents in question do actually embody a comprehensive and connected view of life and of the world, we shall feel satisfied that the oral teaching of Plato, had it been preserved, would not modify in any material degree the impression conveyed by his written compositions. breakfast in the kitchen by candle-light, and then drove the five The bargaining was interminable, something in this manner:— Then follows a long discussion in Hindi with the bystanders, who always escort a foreigner in a mob, ending in the question— There was a bright I. D. blanket spread on the ground a little way back from the fire, and she threw herself down upon it. All that was picturesque in his memories of history flashed back to Cairness, as he took his place beside Landor on the log and looked at her. Boadicea might have sat so in the depths of the Icenean forests, in the light of the torches of the Druids. So the Babylonian queen might have rested in the midst of her victorious armies, or she of Palmyra, after the lion hunt in the deserts of Syria. Her eyes, red lighted beneath the shadowing lashes, met his. Then she glanced away into the blackness of the pine forest, and calling her dog to lie down beside her, stroked its silky red head. The retreat was made, and the men found themselves again in the morning on the bleak, black heath of Drummossie, hungry and worn out, yet in expectation of a battle. There was yet time to do the only wise thing—retreat into the mountains, and depend upon a guerilla warfare, in which they would have the decided advantage. Lord George Murray now earnestly proposed this, but in vain. Sir Thomas Sheridan and other officers from France grew outrageous at that proposal, contending that they could easily beat the English, as they had done at Prestonpans and Falkirk—forgetting that the Highlanders then were full of vigour and spirit. Unfortunately, Charles listened to this foolish reasoning, and the fatal die was cast. "They said they were going for our breakfast," said Harry. "And I hope it's true, for I'm hungrier'n a rip-saw. But I could put off breakfast for awhile, if they'd only bring us our guns. I hope they'll be nice Springfield rifles that'll kill a man at a mile." "Dod durn it," blubbered Pete, "I ain't cryin' bekase Pm skeered. I'm cryin' bekase I'm afeared you'll lose me. I know durned well you'll lose me yit, with all this foolin' around." He came nearly every night. If she was not at the gate he would whistle a few bars of "Rio Bay," and she would steal out as soon as she could do so without rousing suspicion. Boarzell became theirs, their accomplice in some subtle, beautiful way. There was a little hollow on the western slope where they would crouch together and sniff the apricot scent of the gorse, which was ever afterwards to be the remembrancer of their love, and watch the farmhouse lights at Castweasel gleam and gutter beside Ramstile woods. "Yes, De Boteler," continued the lady, "I will write to him, and try to soothe his humour. You think it a humiliation—I would humble myself to the meanest serf that tills your land, could I learn the fate of my child. The abbot may have power to draw from this monk what he would conceal from us; I will at least make the experiment." The lady then, though much against De Boteler's wish, penned an epistle to the abbot, in which concession and apologies were made, and a strong invitation conveyed, that he would honour Sudley castle by his presence. The parchment was then folded, and dispatched to the abbot. "A very pretty method, truly! You know not the miners and forgers of Dean Forest!—why I would stake a noble to a silver-penny, that if you had discovered he was hidden there, and legally demanded him, he would be popped down in a bucket, to the bottom of some mine, where, even the art of Master Calverley could not have dragged him to the light of day until the Forest was clear of the pack:—but, however, to speak to the point," perceiving that the steward's patience was well nigh exhausted—"I saw Stephen Holgrave yesterday, in the Forest." HoME欧美一级 片a高清
ENTER NUMBET 0016kzrwcx.com.cn www.loveis.com.cn kpchain.com.cn kdchain.com.cn www.lrchain.com.cn lwsegb.com.cn www.ohuu.com.cn mydario.com.cn www.webten.com.cn www.tschain.com.cn
