15 Useful Code Sharing Websites for Web Developers
Web development is rarely done in isolation. Even if you are a solo coder, at times you might need to share code with others. Maybe you need to share that function with your coder friend, or show a snippet for debugging to a colleague? In such cases, code sharing websites come in handy and prove to be useful.
Basically, such code sharing websites allow you to share code snippets with others as a matter of simple copy and paste. You copy code from your code editor and paste it in the code sharing website, and then share the link or page with your team members or colleagues. This way you can also build your own code and snippet libraries as well.
But which code sharing websites are the best ones? In this article, we have put together 15 of the best code sharing websites for you.
15 Useful Code Sharing Websites for Web Developers
1 Dabblet
Dabblet lets you break the tasks and interface into different parts for easier visualization. You can use different previews for both code and its output. Dabblet is not the most feature rich code sharing website out there but it does its task well.
The focus of Dabblet is on productivity and easier workflow management. It does not have a ton of options for you to work with, but instead allows you to simply share code in the manner you deem fit, be it with or without previews.
2 Liveweave
Liveweave is an extremely feature rich and powerful code sharing and web development solution for CSS3, HTML5 and JavaScript. It comes loaded with numerous JS libraries as well as color palettes and other framework management tools.
Liveweave has its own CSS code generator. Beyond that, if you wish to, you can use it to generate dummy text as well for your projects. Liveweave is fairly simple to use and offers an independent semi-window or panel for each language of choice, such as CSS, HTML and JS code operates independently.
3 JSFiddle
JSFiddle was and continues to be one of the first code sharing websites in its league. It is rather obvious and straightforward to use. You have four separate panels or sub-windows to work with. Each panel is dedicated to HTML, CSS and JavaScript respectively, with the fourth panel being reserved for output.
Other than code collaboration, JSFiddle comes with some very neat features of its own. It supports various JS libraries and also has the ability to auto save your code locally. You can use it to generate embed code, or preview how the code looks when working with your team members on a project.
4 Codeply
Codeply is a very popular code sharing website and frontend editor. It is renowned for the fact that it supports virtually every piece of technology, framework or boilerplate that might be used in frontend design and development. Bootstrap, Foundation, PureCSS, Skeleton, you name it!
Codeply is often used for creation of responsive design and components. You can pick snippets, elements and tools from the editor itself while coding. It has its own community wherein coders can showcase their work. Since Codeply focuses heavily on frontend editing, you can quickly get started with the framework of your choice.
5 Codeshare
Codeshare is a simple and no frills code sharing website that lets you work and share code in realtime. It does not require you to sign up. All you need to do is write or paste your code and share a link with your team members, giving them access to the said code.
Codeshare also has video chat features for better collaboration. However, since it does not require you to sign up, your work is not always saved forever. After a period of two weeks, the shared code will disappear from the website. Owing to its simplicity, Codeshare is quite popular.
6 JS Bin
JS Bin is a code sharing and pastebin solution for HTML, CSS and JavaScript code. The interface is very straightforward. You have the window divided in three panels. On the left and center side, you can enter your code whereas the right section shows the output. You can use the tabs to toggle across code languages or bring up the console, as the need be.
JS Bin is a feature rich solution, and it also has a pro version. The pro version offers features such as the ability to backup your work to Dropbox, use vanity URLs or create private bins that are protected for public view. It costs ?12.99 per month.
7 Codepad
Codepad is apparently the ultimate code sharing platform. So far, of all the options mentioned above, the focus was on HTML, CSS and JavaScript. However, Codepad follows no bias and supports various programming languages. C, C++, Python, PHP, Java, and a lot more in addition to the standard web development ones.
Codepad lets you create public and private code projects as well as share your code with the community. Since there are not many multi-language code sharing websites out there, Codepad does manage to stand out.
8 CSSDeck
Do not be fooled by the name — CSSDeck supports HTML and JavaScript too in addition to, of course, CSS. CSSDeck does not require you to sign up, but since registration is free, you can choose to do so. It currently has over 56,000 registered users.
What makes CSSDeck special? It allows you to code as well as collaborate and share your code snippets. Furthermore, a special feature is that you can create “Codecasts”, that is, create live code streams for given outputs that viewers can watch and follow.
9 GitHub Gist
You were not expecting a list of code sharing websites to be complete without naming GitHub even once, were you?
GitHub Gist is a very popular code sharing solution for developers. Famous for helping open source coders make use of enterprise level tools without burning a hole in their pockets, GitHub Gist lets you share code snippets and projects with your team.
You can choose to have private or public projects. The best part about GitHub Gist is that other than sharing and collaboration, it aids in proper documentation as your team members can leave feedback and ratings on the code.
10 CodePen
CodePen lets you share and work on code snippets by means of “pens”. No, not actual pens. Basically, you create a “pen” and that means you have setup a piece of code to be shared in a playground. You can choose to sign up for Pro version at $9 per month for better integration and to unlock all the features, such as private and locked sharing of code.
CodePen supports most of the famous CSS preprocessors including LESS and SASS, and it allows you to work with CSS, HTML and JS. You can browse others’ pens for inspiration.
11 Snipplr
Snipplr is a website for sharing code snippets with the world as well as your team. Essentially, it is a repository of code snippets from different programming languages — JavaScript, HTML, PHP, CSS, Ruby and even Objective C.
You can share a code snippet right away and it becomes live on the website for everyone to view. Alternatively, you can register and then share snippets via your account to keep them in one place and viewable as per your wishes.
12 CodeProject
CodeProject is more of a knowledge sharing community and less of a code pastebin. If you are looking for a “paste code, get link, go share” solution, CodeProject might be overkill for you.
It allows you to start threads and posts about code snippets that other users can view and learn from as well as leave feedback on. It supports virtually every coding language, including .NET and C# as well as database stuff such as SQL. Need more? CodeProject has separate sections for mobile developers such as Android and iOS.
CodeProject is a very good place to start if you wish to learn better coding and seek feedback on your coding skills.
13 CollabEdit
CollabEdit does not always rank amongst code sharing websites. However, it does the job really well and surely deserves a mention. CollabEdit is, in essence, a collaborative code editor (isn’t that obvious from the name itself?).
It lets you collaborate on your code in real-time with your team members. Plus, it supports almost all the major coding languages and comes loaded with virtually all the features that you can expect from a code editor such as syntax highlighting and document history.
CollabEdit offers live chat for you to communicate better with your team members while working.
14 Pasted.co
Pasted.co is a code sharing website and pastebin with a rather unique offering of its own. For the most part, it functions like every other such site out there — you paste your code, secure it by means of password if you wish to, and then share the link.
However, this is where it gets interesting. Pasted.co shows advertisements on the page each time someone clicks your link to see the shared code. And, it shares a part of the advertisement revenue with you! Thus, once you sign up with Pasted.co and share your code using it, you also have the opportunity of making some extra money.
15 Etherpad
Etherpad is an open source code editor with collaborative code editing in real-time. This means you and your team members can code simultaneously and collaborate effectively.
Etherpad facilitates collaboration by allowing you to interact via any of the available instances. The editor is open source and free to use and you can extend it by means of plugins.
However, you need to download Etherpad base software and install it on your computer in order to be able to use it. Etherpad supports Linux, Mac and Windows devices.
Over To You
Of course, before you start sharing code snippets you need to write the code. If you’re looking for a smooth and innovative free code editor, we highly recommend Brackets. It’s completely free to use and comes with many useful free extensions that expand its features even further.
That again was no use: he but got another smile and a friendly look of the sort he no longer wanted. I said I thought I could gallop if Harry could, and in a few minutes we were up with the ambulance. It had stopped. There were several men about it, including Sergeant Jim and Kendall, which two had come from Quinn, and having just been in the ambulance, at Ferry's side, were now remounting, both of them openly in tears. "Hello, Kendall." We have this great advantage in dealing with Plato—that his philosophical writings have come down to us entire, while the thinkers who preceded him are known only through fragments and second-hand reports. Nor is the difference merely accidental. Plato was the creator of speculative literature, properly so called: he was the first and also the greatest artist that ever clothed abstract thought in language of appropriate majesty and splendour; and it is probably to their beauty of form that we owe the preservation of his writings. Rather unfortunately, however, along with the genuine works of the master, a certain number of pieces have been handed down to us under his name, of which some are almost universally admitted to be spurious, while the authenticity of others is a question on which the best scholars are still divided. In the absence of any very cogent external evidence, an immense amount of industry and learning has been expended on this subject, and the arguments employed on both sides sometimes make us doubt whether the reasoning powers of philologists are better developed than, according to Plato, were those of mathematicians in his time. The176 two extreme positions are occupied by Grote, who accepts the whole Alexandrian canon, and Krohn, who admits nothing but the Republic;115 while much more serious critics, such as Schaarschmidt, reject along with a mass of worthless compositions several Dialogues almost equal in interest and importance to those whose authenticity has never been doubted. The great historian of Greece seems to have been rather undiscriminating both in his scepticism and in his belief; and the exclusive importance which he attributed to contemporary testimony, or to what passed for such with him, may have unduly biassed his judgment in both directions. As it happens, the authority of the canon is much weaker than Grote imagined; but even granting his extreme contention, our view of Plato’s philosophy would not be seriously affected by it, for the pieces which are rejected by all other critics have no speculative importance whatever. The case would be far different were we to agree with those who impugn the genuineness of the Parmenides, the Sophist, the Statesman, the Philêbus, and the Laws; for these compositions mark a new departure in Platonism amounting to a complete transformation of its fundamental principles, which indeed is one of the reasons why their authenticity has been denied. Apart, however, from the numerous evidences of Platonic authorship furnished by the Dialogues themselves, as well as by the indirect references to them in Aristotle’s writings, it seems utterly incredible that a thinker scarcely, if at all, inferior to the master himself—as the supposed imitator must assuredly have been—should have consented to let his reasonings pass current under a false name, and that, too, the name of one whose teaching he in some respects controverted; while there is a further difficulty in assuming that his existence could pass unnoticed at a period marked by intense literary and philosophical activity. Readers who177 wish for fuller information on the subject will find in Zeller’s pages a careful and lucid digest of the whole controversy leading to a moderately conservative conclusion. Others will doubtless be content to accept Prof. Jowett’s verdict, that ‘on the whole not a sixteenth part of the writings which pass under the name of Plato, if we exclude the works rejected by the ancients themselves, can be fairly doubted by those who are willing to allow that a considerable change and growth may have taken place in his philosophy.’116 To which we may add that the Platonic dialogues, whether the work of one or more hands, and however widely differing among themselves, together represent a single phase of thought, and are appropriately studied as a connected series. Before entering on our task, one more difficulty remains to be noticed. Plato, although the greatest master of prose composition that ever lived, and for his time a remarkably voluminous author, cherished a strong dislike for books, and even affected to regret that the art of writing had ever been invented. A man, he said, might amuse himself by putting down his ideas on paper, and might even find written178 memoranda useful for private reference, but the only instruction worth speaking of was conveyed by oral communication, which made it possible for objections unforeseen by the teacher to be freely urged and answered.117 Such had been the method of Socrates, and such was doubtless the practice of Plato himself whenever it was possible for him to set forth his philosophy by word of mouth. It has been supposed, for this reason, that the great writer did not take his own books in earnest, and wished them to be regarded as no more than the elegant recreations of a leisure hour, while his deeper and more serious thoughts were reserved for lectures and conversations, of which, beyond a few allusions in Aristotle, every record has perished. That such, however, was not the case, may be easily shown. In the first place it is evident, from the extreme pains taken by Plato to throw his philosophical expositions into conversational form, that he did not despair of providing a literary substitute for spoken dialogue. Secondly, it is a strong confirmation of this theory that Aristotle, a personal friend and pupil of Plato during many years, should so frequently refer to the Dialogues as authoritative evidences of his master’s opinions on the most important topics. And, lastly, if it can be shown that the documents in question do actually embody a comprehensive and connected view of life and of the world, we shall feel satisfied that the oral teaching of Plato, had it been preserved, would not modify in any material degree the impression conveyed by his written compositions. breakfast in the kitchen by candle-light, and then drove the five The bargaining was interminable, something in this manner:— Then follows a long discussion in Hindi with the bystanders, who always escort a foreigner in a mob, ending in the question— There was a bright I. D. blanket spread on the ground a little way back from the fire, and she threw herself down upon it. All that was picturesque in his memories of history flashed back to Cairness, as he took his place beside Landor on the log and looked at her. Boadicea might have sat so in the depths of the Icenean forests, in the light of the torches of the Druids. So the Babylonian queen might have rested in the midst of her victorious armies, or she of Palmyra, after the lion hunt in the deserts of Syria. Her eyes, red lighted beneath the shadowing lashes, met his. Then she glanced away into the blackness of the pine forest, and calling her dog to lie down beside her, stroked its silky red head. The retreat was made, and the men found themselves again in the morning on the bleak, black heath of Drummossie, hungry and worn out, yet in expectation of a battle. There was yet time to do the only wise thing—retreat into the mountains, and depend upon a guerilla warfare, in which they would have the decided advantage. Lord George Murray now earnestly proposed this, but in vain. Sir Thomas Sheridan and other officers from France grew outrageous at that proposal, contending that they could easily beat the English, as they had done at Prestonpans and Falkirk—forgetting that the Highlanders then were full of vigour and spirit. Unfortunately, Charles listened to this foolish reasoning, and the fatal die was cast. "They said they were going for our breakfast," said Harry. "And I hope it's true, for I'm hungrier'n a rip-saw. But I could put off breakfast for awhile, if they'd only bring us our guns. I hope they'll be nice Springfield rifles that'll kill a man at a mile." "Dod durn it," blubbered Pete, "I ain't cryin' bekase Pm skeered. I'm cryin' bekase I'm afeared you'll lose me. I know durned well you'll lose me yit, with all this foolin' around." He came nearly every night. If she was not at the gate he would whistle a few bars of "Rio Bay," and she would steal out as soon as she could do so without rousing suspicion. Boarzell became theirs, their accomplice in some subtle, beautiful way. There was a little hollow on the western slope where they would crouch together and sniff the apricot scent of the gorse, which was ever afterwards to be the remembrancer of their love, and watch the farmhouse lights at Castweasel gleam and gutter beside Ramstile woods. "Yes, De Boteler," continued the lady, "I will write to him, and try to soothe his humour. You think it a humiliation—I would humble myself to the meanest serf that tills your land, could I learn the fate of my child. The abbot may have power to draw from this monk what he would conceal from us; I will at least make the experiment." The lady then, though much against De Boteler's wish, penned an epistle to the abbot, in which concession and apologies were made, and a strong invitation conveyed, that he would honour Sudley castle by his presence. The parchment was then folded, and dispatched to the abbot. "A very pretty method, truly! You know not the miners and forgers of Dean Forest!—why I would stake a noble to a silver-penny, that if you had discovered he was hidden there, and legally demanded him, he would be popped down in a bucket, to the bottom of some mine, where, even the art of Master Calverley could not have dragged him to the light of day until the Forest was clear of the pack:—but, however, to speak to the point," perceiving that the steward's patience was well nigh exhausted—"I saw Stephen Holgrave yesterday, in the Forest." HoME欧美一级 片a高清
ENTER NUMBET 0016jqrzg.com.cn jdlyuch.com.cn lbrrn.com.cn mbsale.com.cn geekkg.com.cn floworks.com.cn www.lxklre.com.cn weiyigo.com.cn www.rjchain.com.cn wotpff.com.cn
Leave a Reply